Work sitch: Our programmer needs the scanner's owner manual its scanning software discs. Can't find them in my boss's old office, so we look in Camilla's office. That was the last place I saw the gear after our tech installed everything, so it made sense to look there. No luck.
We go upstairs to ask Camilla if she knows where the manuals and discs are. She has not a clue. We troop downstairs to look again--though C doesn't look in her office. She looks in my old office, even though the new equipment never lived there. Again, I'm just looking where I last remember seeing the stuff. I have no idea what happened to it after she took over scanner duty.
My first assumption (based on my observation of C's work habits and attitude) is that she got rid of the manuals and software boxes not knowing what they were. She's not the type to ask questions before taking headstrong and uninformed action.
Later, when I grabbed the dictionary to look up the word "fey," I saw some discs and a box of scanning software in my cabinet. It might be what the programmer is looking for, but I'm not sure. Now I'm feeling sheepish and contrite about pinning the missing goods on Camilla--even though carelessness and sloth are accurate descriptors of her M.O.
Volunteer sitch: An organization I volunteer with has committed to a fundraising effort I would call dubious. It was undertaken without informing the board of directors and it's iffy whether the project will generate any revenue. This got me hopping mad. We need to fundraise for our own needs, not pass the hat on behalf of someone else's project, regardless of its merits.
Also frustrating: the organization fails to implement process improvements that would better utilize our limited/existing resources and improve attendance at events (which would increase revenue). Yet we're involved in a fundraising venture that leaves us hoping for a slice of a pie that's not even baked yet. This makes no sense to me.
When I bitched about this--at length--last night to Mike, he asked whether my fiery approach was likely to result in a constructive dialogue. I had to admit that asking "Are you sure there weren't any hallucinogens involved?" would likely make the other parties defensive and preclude discussion.
But that doesn't stop me from being mad or wanting to grab someone by the lapels and holler "What made you think this was a good idea?" I DO get all impassioned with the things I care about.
But here's the part that got me thinking about me: How lickety-split fast do I attribute malice, ignorance, sloth and/or stupidity to the other party? Is this a good idea?
Am I so quick to judgment that I miss the software box in my own cupboard? Or miss the idea that people trying to raise funds (even with dubious methods) weren't also trying a creative way to promote the fiscal health of the organization?
I asked Mike whether my delivery always sucks, or if my counterproductive means of expression is specific to just this volunteer gig. He said, no, he doesn't think my delivery always sucks. I believe him, but I'm still wondering whether my delivery/approach is more of a problem than I want to admit.
